Pima vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,199,651 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $42,950, a difference of 40.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $97,284, a difference of 32.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $83,289, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $50,609, a difference of 1.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $90,372, a difference of 9.1%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 109.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 85.5%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 6.8%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 140.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 102.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 101.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 17.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 75.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 55.9%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 25.5%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.45%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 69.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 67.7%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.41%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 62.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.2%).