Immigrants from Turkey vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,526,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Turkey communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Turkey within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Turkey corresponds to an increase of 98.4 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,368 compared to $42,950, a difference of 19.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,258 compared to $90,372, a difference of 18.7%), and median family income ($118,325 compared to $100,256, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,503 compared to $50,609, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($44,066 compared to $40,257, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,672 compared to $59,837, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 30.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.2%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Turkey and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.2%).