Fijian vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,901,934 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.719. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.098% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 97.9 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $53,457, a difference of 17.2%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $42,950, a difference of 17.1%), and median earnings ($40,193 compared to $46,564, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $50,609, a difference of 0.95%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $59,837, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.5%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.2%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 40.1%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 31.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 74.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 55.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.6%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and male disability (12.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.6%).