Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 330,487,763 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 16.0 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $42,950, a difference of 21.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $90,372, a difference of 20.3%), and median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $53,457, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $59,837, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $50,609, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $40,257, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 24.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.74%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.4%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 32.4%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%).