Immigrants from Moldova vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,077,293 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Moldova communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.534. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Moldova within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.468% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Moldova corresponds to an increase of 468.2 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($91,446 compared to $76,387, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,357 compared to $89,811, a difference of 19.5%), and median family income ($109,975 compared to $92,872, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.3%), median female earnings ($42,304 compared to $36,920, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($56,168 compared to $48,977, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 43.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 38.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 7.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father poverty (15.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 34.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.59%), family households (64.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.5%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 30.7%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 29.6%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Moldova and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 29.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.1%).