Immigrants from El Salvador vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,785,835 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to an increase of 25.1 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $48,977, a difference of 11.5%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,226 compared to $54,699, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,545 compared to $92,872, a difference of 0.35%), median female earnings ($36,673 compared to $36,920, a difference of 0.67%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,913 compared to $85,899, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.7%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.20%), male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.5%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.7%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.3% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 0.48%), births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and currently married (43.1% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.16%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 83.5%), college, under 1 year (56.4% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and high school diploma (80.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 39.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.2%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 3.0%).