Comanche vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,682,621 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 14.3 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,088 compared to $40,244, a difference of 5.7%), median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $50,611, a difference of 5.0%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $92,872, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,922 compared to $54,699, a difference of 0.41%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $48,977, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.3%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and family poverty (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.30%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.9%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.050%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.14%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 6.4%), associate's degree (39.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.1%), hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.3% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.6%).