Immigrants from Sweden vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,710,155 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 6.7 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $40,244, a difference of 38.1%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $92,872, a difference of 32.2%), and median household income ($100,699 compared to $76,387, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $48,977, a difference of 9.5%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $36,920, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 45.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 36.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.10%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.46%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 81.5%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 78.2%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 59.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 38.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 7.1%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.5%).