Immigrants from the Azores vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,372,347 people shows no correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,322 compared to $85,899, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,621 compared to $48,977, a difference of 7.4%), and wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,608 compared to $40,244, a difference of 1.6%), median family income ($95,402 compared to $92,872, a difference of 2.7%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $36,920, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 33.5%), receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.35%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.0%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.1% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.43%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.6%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.75%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.9%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 32.9%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 68.6%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and female disability (14.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.090%), male disability (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 0.70%).