Immigrants from Grenada vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,581,843 people shows no correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 56.8%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $36,920, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $48,977, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($76,517 compared to $76,387, a difference of 0.17%), median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $50,611, a difference of 0.66%), and per capita income ($41,123 compared to $40,244, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 38.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 37.4%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.78%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 56.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.1%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.6%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.33%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 259.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 149.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 121.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 43.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 93.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 121.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 64.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 53.3%), and disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.84%).