Crow vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,350,946 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.922. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.900% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 899.7 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 33.1%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $40,244, a difference of 26.8%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $92,872, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $48,977, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $36,920, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $54,699, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 74.8%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 73.7%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.42%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 16.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 220.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 214.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 185.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.9%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.20, a difference of 19.7%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (65.3% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.9%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.31%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.7%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.40%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.3%).