Central American vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,834,330 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Central American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.445. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Central Americans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Central Americans corresponds to an increase of 5.5 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Central American and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 9.7%), householder income under 25 years ($52,626 compared to $48,977, a difference of 7.4%), and median male earnings ($48,093 compared to $50,611, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,144 compared to $85,899, a difference of 0.89%), median female earnings ($36,492 compared to $36,920, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $89,811, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Central American and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (20.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Central American and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 12.4%), female unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Central American and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Central American and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.9% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 0.27%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and currently married (43.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Central American and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.2%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.58%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Central American and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and college, under 1 year (57.7% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Central American and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.0%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.97%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 2.7%).