Immigrants from Eritrea vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,251,957 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 11.6 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.2%), median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $36,920, a difference of 12.4%), and median household income ($85,025 compared to $76,387, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $48,977, a difference of 5.3%), median male earnings ($53,715 compared to $50,611, a difference of 6.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $89,811, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.7%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 15.6%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and married-couple households (42.1% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.4%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.34%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.1%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.2%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.33%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 33.6%), male disability (10.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 10.4%).