Norwegian vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,949,750 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 14.9 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $89,811, a difference of 15.4%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $92,872, a difference of 14.3%), and wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $36,920, a difference of 5.1%), median earnings ($46,865 compared to $43,333, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $48,977, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 50.4%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 48.6%), and married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.4%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.7%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 24.8%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 61.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and associate's degree (47.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.1%).