Native Hawaiian vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,578,756 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.138. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $54,699, a difference of 29.8%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $76,387, a difference of 17.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $89,811, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.29%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $40,244, a difference of 1.9%), and median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $50,611, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 29.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.1%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and married-couple households (49.1% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.6%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 33.5%), master's degree (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.19%), bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.2%).