Immigrants from Uruguay vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,179,723 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 7.7 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $40,244, a difference of 9.3%), median household income ($82,560 compared to $76,387, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $89,811, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $54,699, a difference of 4.2%), and median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $50,611, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.2%), single female poverty (20.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.4%), family poverty (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and female poverty (14.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 8.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.060%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 21.4%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 32.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 32.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.8%).