Fijian vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,563,717 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.487. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 24.6 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $50,611, a difference of 11.0%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and per capita income ($36,690 compared to $40,244, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $48,977, a difference of 2.4%), median household income ($74,205 compared to $76,387, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $54,699, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 11.3%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and poverty (13.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.0%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.8%), married-couple households (46.1% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.87%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.8%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 28.4%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.64%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.5%).