Puget Sound Salish vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,988,332 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to an increase of 1.4 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $48,977, a difference of 13.4%), median household income ($84,011 compared to $76,387, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $54,699, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.040%), per capita income ($41,495 compared to $40,244, a difference of 3.1%), and median family income ($97,958 compared to $92,872, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 30.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 20.3%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.81%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 30.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.85%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.3%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 22.1%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (55.9% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.4%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.14%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.48%), and female disability (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.1%).