Hmong vs Osage Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Osage
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Osage
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,726
SOCIAL INDEX
34.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
211th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Osage Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,036,586 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.200% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 199.9 Osage.
Hmong vs Osage Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Osage communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $45,764, a difference of 7.9%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $50,292, a difference of 4.2%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $39,568, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $84,461, a difference of 0.24%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $88,390, a difference of 0.31%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $91,926, a difference of 0.69%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Osage |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Tragic $39,568 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $91,926 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Tragic $75,240 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Tragic $42,651 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $50,292 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Tragic $36,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Tragic $45,764 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Tragic $84,461 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $88,390 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $55,677 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 27.1% |
Hmong vs Osage Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Osage communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 22.0%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.6%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Osage |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 13.6% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 9.7% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 17.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 16.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 24.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 19.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 32.6% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Average 11.7% |
Hmong vs Osage Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 54.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Osage |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Average 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Hmong vs Osage Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Osage |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 63.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 78.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 39.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 82.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 80.6% |
Hmong vs Osage Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Osage communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 15.6%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.15%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 0.88%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Osage |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Average 6.4% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Excellent 47.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Fair 32.1% |
Hmong vs Osage Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Osage |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 58.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 22.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Hmong vs Osage Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Osage communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.9%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Osage |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 84.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 62.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 55.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 33.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Hmong vs Osage Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Osage communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 61.6%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Osage |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.0% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 27.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |