Hmong vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,784,745 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 45.9 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $46,700, a difference of 22.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $104,408, a difference of 18.5%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $56,837, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $61,465, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $54,335, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.8%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.97%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 48.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 9.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.79%), currently married (47.1% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.3%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.6%).