Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Jordan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Jordan

Average
Excellent
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,031
SOCIAL INDEX
87.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
33rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Jordan Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,029,490 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 45.9 Immigrants from Jordan.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Jordan Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $106,164, a difference of 20.5%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $57,145, a difference of 18.4%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $45,066, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,370, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $63,041, a difference of 11.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Jordan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Excellent
$45,066
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$107,715
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$89,412
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$48,673
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$57,145
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$40,977
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Poor
$51,370
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Excellent
$97,185
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$106,164
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Excellent
$63,041
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Fair
26.3%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (23.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 19.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.6%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Jordan
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Excellent
11.9%
Families
Average
9.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Good
10.8%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Good
15.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
27.1%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Jordan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.3%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Jordan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Excellent
83.1%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.9%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Jordan
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
47.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
29.0%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Jordan
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Good
19.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
6.5%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Jordan
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Excellent
95.1%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
91.8%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Excellent
89.8%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
86.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
67.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
40.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.0%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Jordan Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Jordan
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%