Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Average
Poor
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,327,835 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.359. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.335% in Immigrants from Bangladesh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 334.7 Immigrants from Bangladesh.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 32.2%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $39,910, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $54,714, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $55,394, a difference of 1.7%), median family income ($91,296 compared to $94,665, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $92,208, a difference of 4.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Bangladesh
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Poor
$41,709
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Tragic
$94,665
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Tragic
$80,722
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Tragic
$51,642
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Good
$39,910
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Exceptional
$54,714
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Tragic
$90,448
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Tragic
$92,208
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Tragic
$55,394
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
20.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 50.4%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 45.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 0.37%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.4%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Bangladesh
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
20.1%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
19.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Tragic
31.1%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
15.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 51.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.2%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Bangladesh
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
21.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.4%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 28.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.69%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Bangladesh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
64.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
30.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
70.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
80.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.4%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.8%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Bangladesh
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.1%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Good
30.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 148.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 79.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 20.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 49.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 67.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
25.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Tragic
74.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
38.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
12.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
3.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 61.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (57.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Bangladesh
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.8%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
92.4%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
91.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
85.5%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
61.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
56.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Fair
45.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Average
37.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Average
1.8%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Bangladesh communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 42.9%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.34%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.0%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Bangladesh Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Bangladesh
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Excellent
10.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%