Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uruguay
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Uruguay

Average
Fair
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,806
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
209th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uruguay Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,007,335 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 54.6 Immigrants from Uruguay.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Uruguay Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $43,997, a difference of 15.4%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $38,945, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $56,975, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $52,302, a difference of 5.9%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $98,205, a difference of 7.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Uruguay
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Average
$43,997
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Tragic
$98,205
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Poor
$82,560
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Fair
$45,682
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Poor
$52,860
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Poor
$38,945
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Average
$52,302
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Poor
$91,171
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Poor
$96,086
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Tragic
$56,975
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
24.6%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 22.8%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.10%), male poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and female poverty (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Uruguay
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Average
9.1%
Poor
9.5%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Fair
13.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Poor
17.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Fair
16.7%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Average
29.1%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Poor
12.5%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 82.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Uruguay
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
7.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Uruguay
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
34.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 22.2%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.65%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Uruguay
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.5%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
33.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Uruguay
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
11.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Tragic
88.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
51.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
17.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
5.4%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.8%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (63.5% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Uruguay
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.2%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
93.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
87.6%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Tragic
84.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
63.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Poor
58.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Average
37.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.52%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uruguay Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Uruguay
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Excellent
2.4%