Hmong vs Turkish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Turkish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Turks
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Turkish Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,124,546 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.124% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 123.7 Turks.
Hmong vs Turkish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $52,391, a difference of 37.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $117,814, a difference of 33.7%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $64,253, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.020%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $54,266, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $68,037, a difference of 20.8%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Turkish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Exceptional $52,391 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Exceptional $121,202 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Exceptional $99,389 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Exceptional $53,919 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Exceptional $64,253 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Exceptional $44,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Exceptional $54,266 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Exceptional $110,318 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Exceptional $117,814 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Exceptional $68,037 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 27.7% |
Hmong vs Turkish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.73%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Turkish |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 13.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Hmong vs Turkish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 59.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Turkish |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Good 17.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Average 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Hmong vs Turkish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Turkish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 66.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 35.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Tragic 73.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Hmong vs Turkish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.8%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Turkish |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 63.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Hmong vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Turkish |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Poor 54.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Hmong vs Turkish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 69.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 65.7%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.14%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Turkish |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Exceptional 88.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 70.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Hmong vs Turkish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Turkish |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |