Hmong vs Turkish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Turkish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Turks

Average
Exceptional
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,373
SOCIAL INDEX
91.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
17th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Turkish Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,124,546 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.124% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 123.7 Turks.
Hmong Integration in Turkish Communities

Hmong vs Turkish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $52,391, a difference of 37.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $117,814, a difference of 33.7%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $64,253, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.020%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $54,266, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $68,037, a difference of 20.8%).
Hmong vs Turkish Income
Income MetricHmongTurkish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$52,391
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$121,202
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$99,389
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$53,919
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$64,253
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$44,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Exceptional
$54,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Exceptional
$110,318
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$117,814
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Exceptional
$68,037
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Hmong vs Turkish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.73%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Hmong vs Turkish Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongTurkish
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Average
9.1%
Exceptional
7.5%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
18.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Hmong vs Turkish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 59.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Hmong vs Turkish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongTurkish
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%

Hmong vs Turkish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Hmong vs Turkish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongTurkish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
35.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
73.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.8%

Hmong vs Turkish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.8%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Hmong vs Turkish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongTurkish
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
27.4%

Hmong vs Turkish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.6%).
Hmong vs Turkish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongTurkish
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
5.8%

Hmong vs Turkish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 69.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 65.7%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.14%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Hmong vs Turkish Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongTurkish
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
88.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
70.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
65.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
46.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
19.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.7%

Hmong vs Turkish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
Hmong vs Turkish Disability
Disability MetricHmongTurkish
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%