Hmong vs British Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
British
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

British

Average
Good
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,012
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
92nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

British Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,580,685 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of British within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.436% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 435.9 British.
Hmong Integration in British Communities

Hmong vs British Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and British communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $46,571, a difference of 22.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $106,264, a difference of 20.6%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $57,890, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,477, a difference of 4.3%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $39,772, a difference of 12.0%).
Hmong vs British Income
Income MetricHmongBritish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$46,571
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$108,705
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$88,914
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$48,189
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$57,890
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Average
$39,772
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Poor
$51,477
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Excellent
$98,359
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$106,264
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Exceptional
$63,940
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
28.9%

Hmong vs British Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and British communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 16.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 16.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
Hmong vs British Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongBritish
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Average
9.1%
Exceptional
7.9%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
14.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Hmong vs British Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 43.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Hmong vs British Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongBritish
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.0%

Hmong vs British Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Hmong vs British Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongBritish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
40.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
76.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Fair
82.6%

Hmong vs British Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.26%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.4%).
Hmong vs British Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongBritish
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Good
30.8%

Hmong vs British Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 36.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Hmong vs British Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongBritish
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
92.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
60.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.2%

Hmong vs British Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and British communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.1%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%).
Hmong vs British Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongBritish
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
87.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
62.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
40.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Hmong vs British Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.75%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and male disability (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Hmong vs British Disability
Disability MetricHmongBritish
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%