Hmong vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,547,169 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.166. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.308% in Trinidadians and Tobagonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 307.9 Trinidadians and Tobagonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 43.3%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $40,958, a difference of 15.4%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $41,655, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $55,327, a difference of 1.8%), median family income ($91,296 compared to $94,466, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $91,357, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 46.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 36.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 66.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 39.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 25.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 31.5%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.62%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 129.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 64.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 17.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 41.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 54.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.4%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 1.0%).