Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Brazil
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Brazil

Average
Good
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,381
SOCIAL INDEX
71.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
119th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Brazil Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,987,112 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.184% in Immigrants from Brazil. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 184.1 Immigrants from Brazil.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Brazil Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $48,164, a difference of 26.4%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $58,324, a difference of 20.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $106,470, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $54,487, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $62,364, a difference of 10.7%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Brazil
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$48,164
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$109,418
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$90,907
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$49,463
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$58,324
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$41,273
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Exceptional
$54,487
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Exceptional
$100,534
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$106,470
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Excellent
$62,364
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.0%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.9%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 17.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Brazil
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Average
9.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Excellent
12.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
18.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
19.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.8%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 53.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Brazil
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Brazil
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Good
37.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.8%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.93%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Brazil
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
29.6%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 22.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.090%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 9.5%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Brazil
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Fair
10.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
17.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
5.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.3%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Brazil
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Average
97.7%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Good
95.0%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Good
94.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Good
89.5%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Excellent
86.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Excellent
66.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
61.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
50.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
42.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Brazil communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Brazil Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Brazil
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
21.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Poor
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%