Hmong vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,062,123 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.990. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.966% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 2,965.7 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 20.9%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $45,607, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $79,956, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $56,768, a difference of 0.76%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $35,114, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $50,132, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 19.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (23.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.030%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 57.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.8%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.1%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 39.2%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 30.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.62%).