Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Lithuania

Average
Exceptional
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,667,914 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 43.9 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $51,361, a difference of 34.7%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $63,346, a difference of 31.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $114,336, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $55,028, a difference of 11.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $66,087, a difference of 17.3%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
28.6%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 33.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.0%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Average
9.1%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 57.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
5.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.0%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.7%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
27.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
5.6%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.7%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 37.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%