Hmong vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,329,110 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.303% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 302.8 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ute communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $52,949, a difference of 6.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $83,937, a difference of 5.0%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $72,402, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.31%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $49,997, a difference of 1.3%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $48,899, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ute communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (11.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 39.4%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.8%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.1%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 101.7%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 65.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.83%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.5%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 28.3%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.060%), 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 31.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.8%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.3%).