Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Chile

Average
Good
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Chile Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,399,480 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.065% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 64.6 Immigrants from Chile.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $46,213, a difference of 21.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $103,412, a difference of 17.4%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $88,388, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $52,440, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $62,354, a difference of 10.7%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Chile
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$46,213
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Excellent
$105,655
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Excellent
$88,388
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Excellent
$47,697
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Excellent
$55,954
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Good
$40,353
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Good
$52,440
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Excellent
$97,159
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Excellent
$103,412
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Excellent
$62,354
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Average
25.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.5%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Chile
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Average
12.2%
Families
Average
9.1%
Average
8.9%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Average
11.1%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Good
15.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Good
15.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Good
15.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Good
11.5%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Chile
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Good
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
5.5%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.5%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Chile
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
34.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Excellent
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 12.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.86%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.87%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Chile
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Average
46.5%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Good
31.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.63%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 6.7%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Chile
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Poor
89.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Poor
54.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Poor
18.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Poor
6.1%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.6%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.0%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.22%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Chile
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Fair
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Average
85.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
49.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.1%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Chile Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Chile
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%