Hmong vs Barbadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,164,416 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Barbadians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.414% in Barbadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 413.8 Barbadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 46.1%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $41,261, a difference of 16.2%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $42,406, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $90,266, a difference of 2.4%), median family income ($91,296 compared to $93,919, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $54,163, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 51.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 38.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 1.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 61.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 46.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 33.3%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.8%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 151.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 78.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 21.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 50.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 66.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.4%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Barbadian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.35%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%).