Hmong vs Japanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,970,054 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Japanese within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.256. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.256% in Japanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 256.2 Japanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 16.4%), median household income ($75,839 compared to $83,395, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $96,834, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $57,919, a difference of 2.8%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $39,870, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $52,365, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 29.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 65.0%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 26.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.2%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.55%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 71.8%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Japanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.1%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%).