Hmong vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Creek

Average
Fair
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,672,770 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 12.6 Creek.
Hmong Integration in Creek Communities

Hmong vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $74,847, a difference of 12.6%), median household income ($75,839 compared to $67,715, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $78,960, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $46,594, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $33,437, a difference of 6.2%).
Hmong vs Creek Income
Income MetricHmongCreek
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.1%

Hmong vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.4%).
Hmong vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongCreek
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.1%

Hmong vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.7%).
Hmong vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongCreek
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%

Hmong vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Hmong vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
77.7%

Hmong vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 35.4%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.30%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Hmong vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongCreek
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
37.6%

Hmong vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.79%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Hmong vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongCreek
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.2%

Hmong vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Hmong vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongCreek
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.3%

Hmong vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.4%).
Hmong vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricHmongCreek
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%