Hmong vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Creek
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,672,770 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 12.6 Creek.
Hmong vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $74,847, a difference of 12.6%), median household income ($75,839 compared to $67,715, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $78,960, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $46,594, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $33,437, a difference of 6.2%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 27.1% |
Hmong vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.4%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Creek |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
Hmong vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 75.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Creek |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.8% |
Hmong vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 77.7% |
Hmong vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 35.4%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.30%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Creek |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 37.6% |
Hmong vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.79%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Hmong vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 27.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 21.0%), and bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.12%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.3% |
Hmong vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 39.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.94%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.4%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Creek |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.8% |