Hmong vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Sub-Saharan Africans

Average
Tragic
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Subsaharan African Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,564,571 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.216% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 215.6 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Hmong Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

Hmong vs Subsaharan African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 21.4%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $38,391, a difference of 8.2%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $40,152, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $84,235, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $56,615, a difference of 0.49%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $48,691, a difference of 1.4%).
Hmong vs Subsaharan African Income
Income MetricHmongSubsaharan African
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Tragic
$40,152
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Tragic
$93,748
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Tragic
$77,631
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Tragic
$44,118
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Tragic
$50,408
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Tragic
$38,391
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Tragic
$48,691
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Tragic
$84,235
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Tragic
$90,691
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Tragic
$56,615
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
22.8%

Hmong vs Subsaharan African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 20.0%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 0.38%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Hmong vs Subsaharan African Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongSubsaharan African
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
13.3%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
20.8%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
20.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Tragic
23.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Tragic
31.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.1%

Hmong vs Subsaharan African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.1%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.6%).
Hmong vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongSubsaharan African
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%

Hmong vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.74%).
Hmong vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongSubsaharan African
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
75.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Poor
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
82.0%

Hmong vs Subsaharan African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 32.1%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Hmong vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongSubsaharan African
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
41.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Tragic
42.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
36.7%

Hmong vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.2%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 17.5%).
Hmong vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongSubsaharan African
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
51.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
17.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Hmong vs Subsaharan African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (57.2% compared to 57.3%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.36%).
Hmong vs Subsaharan African Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongSubsaharan African
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Tragic
84.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Tragic
63.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
57.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Tragic
43.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
35.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Poor
14.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Poor
4.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Fair
1.8%

Hmong vs Subsaharan African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.0%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.45%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 2.3%).
Hmong vs Subsaharan African Disability
Disability MetricHmongSubsaharan African
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.3%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
25.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%