Hmong vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 4,227,659 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.348% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 348.2 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 18.0%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $32,345, a difference of 17.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,258 compared to $71,697, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $59,383, a difference of 5.4%), median family income ($91,296 compared to $82,064, a difference of 11.3%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $67,965, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 54.5%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 51.0%), and family poverty (9.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.2%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 186.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 171.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 162.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 69.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.6%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.5%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 41.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 34.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.6%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 34.0%), and bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.8%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.34%), disability (12.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.4%).