Hmong vs Icelander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,308,051 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.583% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 582.6 Icelanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $44,987, a difference of 18.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $102,261, a difference of 16.1%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $55,415, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.84%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,247, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $61,270, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 95.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.3%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.18%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 7.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 0.37%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.8%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.7%).