Hmong vs Scandinavian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Scandinavians

Average
Good
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Scandinavian Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,458,349 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Scandinavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 42.2 Scandinavians.
Hmong Integration in Scandinavian Communities

Hmong vs Scandinavian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $102,969, a difference of 16.9%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $55,527, a difference of 15.1%), and per capita income ($38,120 compared to $43,848, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $52,654, a difference of 6.7%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $38,306, a difference of 7.9%).
Hmong vs Scandinavian Income
Income MetricHmongScandinavian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Average
$43,848
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Good
$104,410
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Good
$86,073
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Average
$46,433
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Good
$55,527
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Tragic
$38,306
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Good
$52,654
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Good
$95,596
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Good
$102,969
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Good
$61,586
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
29.1%

Hmong vs Scandinavian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.2%).
Hmong vs Scandinavian Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongScandinavian
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Families
Average
9.1%
Exceptional
7.6%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Fair
20.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.7%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
14.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Average
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

Hmong vs Scandinavian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 40.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Hmong vs Scandinavian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongScandinavian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%

Hmong vs Scandinavian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Hmong vs Scandinavian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongScandinavian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Good
83.0%

Hmong vs Scandinavian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.0%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.48%).
Hmong vs Scandinavian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongScandinavian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
49.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
29.8%

Hmong vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 47.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 12.6%).
Hmong vs Scandinavian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongScandinavian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
7.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
93.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
62.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
8.0%

Hmong vs Scandinavian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.52%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
Hmong vs Scandinavian Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongScandinavian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
67.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Good
46.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
14.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Average
1.8%

Hmong vs Scandinavian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Scandinavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.58%), male disability (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Hmong vs Scandinavian Disability
Disability MetricHmongScandinavian
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Average
23.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.6%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%