Hmong vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from England
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from England

Average
Good
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,183
SOCIAL INDEX
79.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
83rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from England Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,264,382 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.264. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.108% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 108.0 Immigrants from England.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from England Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from England Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $48,844, a difference of 28.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $109,446, a difference of 24.2%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $59,527, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.72%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,817, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $41,277, a difference of 16.3%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from England Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from England
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$48,844
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$112,038
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$92,098
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$49,722
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$59,527
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$41,277
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Fair
$51,817
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Exceptional
$102,020
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$109,446
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Exceptional
$65,715
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from England Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 16.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.3%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from England Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from England
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Average
9.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
16.2%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
20.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.0%

Hmong vs Immigrants from England Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 48.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.7%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from England Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from England
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Good
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.3%

Hmong vs Immigrants from England Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from England Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from England
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
38.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Fair
82.6%

Hmong vs Immigrants from England Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 12.0%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.72%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from England Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from England
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Good
31.1%

Hmong vs Immigrants from England Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 0.50%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from England Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from England
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
58.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
20.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from England Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.5%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.27%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from England Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from England
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
87.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from England Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from England Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from England
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Poor
12.0%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Good
2.4%