Hmong vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Cape Verdean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Cape Verdeans
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cape Verdean Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,617,521 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.701. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.419% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 418.5 Cape Verdeans.
Hmong vs Cape Verdean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 17.4%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $50,077, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $38,614, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($75,839 compared to $75,848, a difference of 0.010%), median family income ($91,296 compared to $91,848, a difference of 0.60%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $87,580, a difference of 0.61%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Cape Verdean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Tragic $39,935 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $91,848 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Tragic $75,848 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Tragic $44,640 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $51,103 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Tragic $38,614 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Poor $51,387 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Tragic $85,758 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $87,580 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $50,077 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Hmong vs Cape Verdean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 93.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 41.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Cape Verdean |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 16.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 18.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 18.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 22.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 21.1% |
Hmong vs Cape Verdean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 52.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 47.2%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Cape Verdean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Average 17.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 11.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 10.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.9% |
Hmong vs Cape Verdean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Cape Verdean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 66.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 44.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Exceptional 78.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 82.1% |
Hmong vs Cape Verdean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 49.0%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 38.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Cape Verdean |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 61.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 38.1% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 8.9% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 39.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 41.3% |
Hmong vs Cape Verdean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 58.6%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Cape Verdean |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Tragic 84.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Tragic 46.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 15.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 4.4% |
Hmong vs Cape Verdean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 59.2%), college, 1 year or more (57.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and college, under 1 year (63.5% compared to 56.0%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Cape Verdean |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.1% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 93.5% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Tragic 92.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 90.8% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 89.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Tragic 87.4% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 80.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 56.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 50.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 38.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 30.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Hmong vs Cape Verdean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.94%), male disability (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Cape Verdean |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 50.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 19.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |