Hmong vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,579,431 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.344% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 344.0 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 10.6%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $47,518, a difference of 3.9%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $88,556, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($38,120 compared to $38,088, a difference of 0.080%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $48,202, a difference of 0.11%), and median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $35,661, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.6%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.2%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and single female poverty (23.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 105.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 32.4%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.7%), bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and associate's degree (43.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.0%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.96%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.2%).