Hmong vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,946,092 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.249% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 248.6 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $47,284, a difference of 24.0%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $55,380, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $100,435, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $49,267, a difference of 0.20%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $61,797, a difference of 9.7%), and median earnings ($42,111 compared to $47,023, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 21.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.7%), female poverty (13.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and poverty (12.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 124.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 21.9%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.2%), currently married (47.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.0%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 39.0%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.7%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.0%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.90%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.2%).