Hmong vs Swiss Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,044,958 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.116% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 116.3 Swiss.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $103,071, a difference of 17.0%), per capita income ($38,120 compared to $44,076, a difference of 15.6%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $55,731, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,493, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $37,904, a difference of 6.8%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.56%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 44.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.4%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.53%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), male disability (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 3.3%).