Hmong vs Filipino Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Filipinos

Average
Exceptional
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Filipino Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,127,515 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 5.792% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 5,792.4 Filipinos.
Hmong Integration in Filipino Communities

Hmong vs Filipino Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $59,066, a difference of 54.9%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $74,224, a difference of 53.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $134,910, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $57,740, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $76,686, a difference of 36.1%).
Hmong vs Filipino Income
Income MetricHmongFilipino
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$59,066
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Exceptional
$138,397
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Exceptional
$115,509
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$61,197
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$74,224
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$49,508
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Exceptional
$57,740
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Exceptional
$128,723
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Exceptional
$134,910
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Exceptional
$76,686
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
29.7%

Hmong vs Filipino Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 59.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 53.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.7%).
Hmong vs Filipino Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongFilipino
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Families
Average
9.1%
Exceptional
6.6%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Exceptional
11.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
24.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
7.4%

Hmong vs Filipino Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 74.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
Hmong vs Filipino Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongFilipino
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.8%

Hmong vs Filipino Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Hmong vs Filipino Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongFilipino
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
31.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
71.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Excellent
84.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.5%

Hmong vs Filipino Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.23%), and family households (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Hmong vs Filipino Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongFilipino
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
51.0%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
23.0%

Hmong vs Filipino Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.96%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Hmong vs Filipino Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongFilipino
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Average
89.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
20.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.9%

Hmong vs Filipino Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 118.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 101.9%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.0%), and 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%).
Hmong vs Filipino Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongFilipino
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
89.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
75.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
71.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
59.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
52.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
23.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
7.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
3.4%

Hmong vs Filipino Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 63.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.5%).
Hmong vs Filipino Disability
Disability MetricHmongFilipino
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.6%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%