Hmong vs Navajo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Navajo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Navajo
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Navajo Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,573,000 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 25.7 Navajo.
Hmong vs Navajo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $29,031, a difference of 31.3%), median family income ($91,296 compared to $70,989, a difference of 28.6%), and median household income ($75,839 compared to $59,159, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $33,046, a difference of 7.4%), median earnings ($42,111 compared to $36,999, a difference of 13.8%), and median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $42,098, a difference of 14.6%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Navajo |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Tragic $29,031 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $70,989 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Tragic $59,159 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Tragic $36,999 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $42,098 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Tragic $33,046 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Tragic $42,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Tragic $66,529 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $69,759 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $47,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Hmong vs Navajo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 138.2%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 106.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 93.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 28.7%), single female poverty (23.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 37.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 51.2%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Navajo |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 23.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Tragic 30.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 31.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 30.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 30.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 31.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 29.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 40.2% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 17.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 19.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 21.1% |
Hmong vs Navajo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 116.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 115.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 102.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 51.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 56.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Navajo |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 29.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 8.2% |
Hmong vs Navajo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 12.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Navajo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Tragic 56.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Tragic 69.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 32.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Tragic 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 72.8% |
Hmong vs Navajo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 85.6%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 38.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.3%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 6.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Navajo |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 40.1% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.65 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 8.8% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 39.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 51.5% |
Hmong vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.9%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Navajo |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 90.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Hmong vs Navajo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 47.2%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.1%), and associate's degree (43.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Navajo |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.3% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 90.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Tragic 87.1% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Tragic 85.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 56.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 50.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 32.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 23.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 9.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Hmong vs Navajo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.2%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.51%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (13.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.2%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Navajo |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Tragic 33.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 58.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 4.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |