Hmong vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,794,016 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.775. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.491% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 491.3 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $52,074, a difference of 36.6%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $62,857, a difference of 30.3%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $118,440, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $53,739, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $66,891, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Australian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.6%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.86%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Australian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Australian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 57.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 52.6%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 22.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.4%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.5%).