Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Uzbekistan

Average
Fair
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uzbekistan Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,742,368 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.305% in Immigrants from Uzbekistan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 304.7 Immigrants from Uzbekistan.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Uzbekistan Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $46,929, a difference of 23.1%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $43,363, a difference of 22.2%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $56,331, a difference of 0.020%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $54,846, a difference of 11.1%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $103,197, a difference of 13.0%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Exceptional
$46,929
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Average
$103,197
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Good
$86,425
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$50,151
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Exceptional
$57,941
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Exceptional
$43,363
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Exceptional
$54,846
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Exceptional
$98,849
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Average
$100,523
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Tragic
$56,331
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
22.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and poverty (12.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.9%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Excellent
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Good
17.0%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Fair
17.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Average
29.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Tragic
16.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.3%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 90.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 32.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.4%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
5.4%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 32.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.67%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Uzbekistan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
29.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
82.3%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.5%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.94%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
45.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Exceptional
25.8%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 157.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 92.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 75.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 22.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 52.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 75.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Uzbekistan
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Tragic
26.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Tragic
73.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
37.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
12.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
3.6%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.2%), master's degree (13.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.3%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.67%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Uzbekistan
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
95.1%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Tragic
94.8%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Good
65.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Excellent
61.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
50.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
42.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
17.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Excellent
2.0%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uzbekistan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 46.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.85%, a difference of 33.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and female disability (13.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Uzbekistan
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
0.85%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%