Hmong vs Russian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Russian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Russians
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,595
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
62nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Russian Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,625,676 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Russians within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.562% in Russians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 562.1 Russians.
Hmong vs Russian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Russian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $53,154, a difference of 39.4%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $63,939, a difference of 32.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $116,328, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $54,389, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $67,626, a difference of 20.0%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Russian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Exceptional $53,154 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Exceptional $120,487 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Exceptional $98,008 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Exceptional $53,334 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Exceptional $63,939 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Exceptional $44,169 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Exceptional $54,389 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Exceptional $110,398 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Exceptional $116,328 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Exceptional $67,626 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 28.0% |
Hmong vs Russian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Russian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 26.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Russian |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Fair 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Exceptional 27.3% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Excellent 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Hmong vs Russian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Russian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 54.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Russian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Excellent 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Hmong vs Russian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Russian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Russian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Poor 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Average 36.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Fair 74.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Hmong vs Russian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Russian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Russian |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Tragic 3.12 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Hmong vs Russian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Russian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.7%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 11.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Russian |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 11.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Tragic 88.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Fair 54.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Poor 6.0% |
Hmong vs Russian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Russian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 69.1%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 62.5%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.32%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Russian |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 91.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 70.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 53.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 45.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Hmong vs Russian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Russian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.0%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Russian |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Exceptional 45.5% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Excellent 2.4% |