Hmong vs Finnish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,989,090 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Finns within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Finns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 33.6 Finns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $43,461, a difference of 14.0%), median male earnings ($48,254 compared to $54,721, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $99,904, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $51,827, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $59,535, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.1%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Finnish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.67%), male disability (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.8%).