Hmong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison
COMPARE
Hmong
Immigrants from Ecuador
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Hmong
Immigrants from Ecuador
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Hmong Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,868,695 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.275% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to an increase of 274.7 Immigrants from Ecuador.
Hmong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 23.2%), median female earnings ($35,498 compared to $38,644, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $53,722, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($91,296 compared to $92,837, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $91,462, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $54,030, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,120 | Tragic $41,195 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $91,296 | Tragic $92,837 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,839 | Tragic $80,341 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,111 | Tragic $44,462 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,254 | Tragic $50,474 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,498 | Poor $38,644 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,364 | Exceptional $53,722 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,258 | Tragic $89,673 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $88,115 | Tragic $91,462 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,339 | Tragic $54,030 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 38.7%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 38.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 0.28%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Poverty Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 14.3% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Tragic 19.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 19.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Tragic 31.3% |
Married Couples | Excellent 5.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 15.0% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 47.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 20.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 13.7% | Excellent 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.7% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.6% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.9% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 31.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Tragic 72.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.6% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 82.2% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 21.6%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.10%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 42.9% |
Average Family Size | Fair 3.21 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.4% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Tragic 43.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.3% | Excellent 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 33.7% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 129.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 64.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 42.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 56.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 23.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Tragic 76.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.8% | Tragic 40.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 4.2% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 58.4%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and college, under 1 year (63.5% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (34.8% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 1.9% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.1% | Tragic 96.9% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.7% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Tragic 93.3% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Tragic 91.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 90.4% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 89.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.3% | Tragic 87.5% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Tragic 84.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Poor 84.9% | Tragic 81.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.5% | Tragic 58.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.2% | Tragic 53.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.4% | Tragic 42.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 34.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 13.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.4% |
Hmong vs Immigrants from Ecuador Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 40.3%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Hmong | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.4% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |